Advertisement

sign up for info 4 security’s free email newsletters – click here
Third Level Navigation:

News Ticker:

Site Search:

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

This is the end of the page
-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-
Main Page Content:

Klass act: a matter of self-defence

13 Jan 10

Following last week's unwanted intrusion by two youths at singer-turned-presenter Myleene Klass' home, and her subsequent actions in self-defence, Brian Sims asks: "Why can we not defend our loved ones, our homes and possessions without fear of reprisals?"

Many of you will know Myleene Klass, the former Hear'Say pop star-turned-M&S model and TV presenter. Many of you will also know what happened to her only a few days ago. However, for those of you that don't, allow me to explain in brief terms.

31-year-old Klass was home alone (save for her two-year-old daughter) last Friday night when she peered through the kitchen window and saw some youths acting suspiciously in her back garden. Bear in mind this incident occurred in the small hours, and at a time when her partner Graham Quinn was away from the family home on business.

The youths first attempted to break into her garden shed in what is a leafy section of Potters Bar before turning and walking towards the house and Klass, who was still safely ensconced within.

Myleene did what most of us would do. Scared witless, she brandished an object - it happened to be a knife - in order to scare the yobs and hope they would disappear. They did.

What happened next was, frankly, astonishing...

Only in self-defence

Hertfordshire Police officers pitched up post-phonecall from a clearly shocked and frightened young woman. According to Klass, the officers told her in no uncertain terms that she should not have brandished the kitchen knife because it was an offensive weapon and she could be arrested as a result.

Beggars belief, doesn't it?

A statement issued by Hertfordshire Police said: "Officers spoke to reassure the home owner, talked through security and gave advice in relation to the importance of reporting suspicious activity immediately to allow officers to act appropriately. For clarification, at no point were any official warnings or words of advice given to the home owner in relation to the use of a knife or offensive weapon in their home."

Should the officers attending not have been more concerned with 'following the tracks in the January snow' and catching the yobs concerned rather than allegedly telling Myleene she's lucky she's not the one that could be up before the Judge? Assuming the errant youths are caught, that is...

Subsequently speaking to a reporter from one of the national newspapers, Klass' agent/representative Jonathan Shalit explained: "Myleene was utterly terrified. She was aghast when she was told that the law did not allow her to defend herself in her own home. All she did was scream loudly and wave the knife to try and frighten them off. She is not looking to be a vigilante, and has the utmost respect for the law, but when the police explained to her that even if you're at home alone and you have an intruder, you are not allowed to protect yourself, she was bemused."

Bemused? Well, that's one way of putting it. I couldn't believe what I was reading.

Standing by and saying nothing

If someone transgresses your border (ie your doorstep) without your say-so, and harbours obvious, discerned intent to either steal or do you (or a member of your family) some serious harm, what are you supposed to do? Just stand there and accept it? Doing nothing could be fatal. Literally.

We seem to dwell in a society in which the criminal fraternity can act almost with impunity in the knowledge that they'll be let off by some out-of-touch-with-reality Judge who'll dish out little more than a slap on the wrists, whereas innocent, law-abiding members of the community cannot even defend their own domain when attacked - or threatened with assault - without fear of reprisal.

Surely there's something inherently wrong in all of that?

Only last night I was watching the news and there was an horrendous story about a man - Roshan Dantis - who murdered 23-year-old Khusbu Shah in Dennistoun, Glasgow before hacking off her head and hands and unceremoniously disposing of them. All because he'd captured the girl - his university classmate's wife - and her husband had refused to pay the £120,000 ransom Dantis demanded via text message for her safe return.

Yesterday, he was given a life sentence by Judge Lord Pentland. On paper 24 years, in real terms probably less.

How is that a life sentence? Dantis will only be in his middle 50s (or younger) on release, and will still have plenty of years ahead of him. Poor Khusbu had barely started to live, and had given birth to her first son only four years ago.

Respecting the law

I was brought up to respect and defer to all forms of authority, most notably the police service. I always have done, and always will.

Following on from that, if any of you have read the campaigns I've run within the pages of Security Management Today, on SMT Online and across info4security in general, you'll know that I'm striving to make this Government recognise the severity and scale of the gun and knife crime problem that pervades our society like a cancer.

For the life of me, though, I cannot see what Myleene Klass did to merit such opprobrium from those who should be protecting her well-being.

In an interview on BBC Radio 5 live's Richard Bacon programme, Klass opined that she thinks the law is "ridiculous", stressing that everyone should have the right to protect their family and property by going to "any lengths possible".

While (like Myleene, in fact) I would not wish to see us all turn into vigilantes, I strongly believe we should all have the basic right to meet unwanted incursions with whatever force is necessary to defend ourselves, our loved ones and our possessions without the potential for being branded as a common criminal in a Court of Law.

Interestingly, Sky News has been running a reader poll on its website asking for peoples' opinions on this incident. Tellingly, all of the responses agree with Klass' actions.

I would be very interested to learn your thoughts on this matter...

I4S NewslettersGet the latest stories first with info4security's newsletters: Click to signup

Post and bookmark this story at the following sites:

Readers' comments

  • Rob Bowser 15 Jan 10

    The law is an ass and the officers who berated Miss Klass need educating as to who they are supposed to be protecting.

    I'm not supprized at all considering the police have all been turned into revenue collectors for the Government, while calls from the public for their assistance distracts them from their speed traps and towing charges.

    Hence the police service's tactics of intimidating the plaintiff and then they'll not receive any more calls.

    Then they can claim crime is down, mainly due to the fact that people will not report it for fear of being treated like a criminal. This case is a fine example of that.

  • Tony Welling 15 Jan 10

    Re: the previous comment...

    Rob, I think you need to read the article again. Hertfordshire Police have stated that the warning about the knife did not happen.

    Would you rather believe the police's version of events or that of a hack from some downmarket tabloid newspaper?

  • Rob Bowser 15 Jan 10

    Should we believe the police service's version of events or a story in one of the downmarket tabloid newspapers?

    Now you mention it, that is a difficult one to answer, isn't it, particularly so in the wake of the Jean Charles de Menezes episode...?

    Don't get me wrong. I'm not anti-police, but they really do have their priorities wrong.

  • Steve Goodwin 15 Jan 10

    While knife and gun crime have spawned numerous articles of late berating the police service and the Courts for what some perceive to be their inaction in terms of helping to keep the population safer, it’s really the Government as a whole that has allowed the situation to escalate to where it is today.

    The Government has shown its inability to make a decision and properly inform the population of its rights (or lack of them).

    Has this Government been ‘tough on crime’? I think not. Ask the retailers and Cash-in-Transit operatives what they think.

    Only recently, Jack Straw highlighted the Government’s ideas on self-defence. In quick succession, he was followed by the Conservatives. If acted upon, the latter’s rationale might well see a number of people up before the beak (and don’t mention Tony Martin).

    While I can sympathise with Myleene Klass, I’m sure that Hertfordshire Police's officers did their level best in the circumstances. Let’s remember that her agent will undoubtedly be looking to gain the maximum publicity from this situation.

    Would you suggest a woman alone in a large house, and with a small child to boot, ought to make it obvious there’s no man at home by appearing in a window brandishing a knife, or anything else that happens to be to hand?

    Given that Myleene Klass is obviously worth a bob or two, and that this could have been an attempt to kidnap for ransom (or worse), it would be prudent if the Hertfordshire Police were to afford her a touch more advice on personal protection.

    The fact that the youths concerned were, more than likely, opportunist thieves and were frightened off when they spotted her (even if it was'nt with the baby's bottle), means that she’s one very lucky lady this time around.

    In the North West/Cheshire, footballers’ families have been under the threat of attack for a while now when the Rooneys and Gerrards of this world are overseas on either club duty or playing for their national side.

    Myleene’s agent might have suggested to be more prudent when identifying that she is sometimes alone and vulnerable. Obviously, the security systems – a panic alarm, for instance – were non-existent, perchance?

    As for self-defence, it’s certainly delusional to think that the rules (the use of minimum force when the chips are down, and you need to react, etc) supposedly in existence are followed and much less given due consideration, in particular by the forces of law and order, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and the Courts.

    They (ie the legal establishment) can turn defence into attack if so desired, by a word, movement or action on your part. If you consider the ‘strike first’ philosophy when in serious danger, do not be surprised if you need the Gods on your side in order to escape their idea of justice.

    In the private security industry, it would be interesting to note (and maybe worth an article) just how many people have had their licences revoked or rescinded by the Security Industry Authority as a result of being caught up in a self-defence scenario which the police, the CPS and the Courts deemed justifiable enough to prosecute, and which resulted in job loss???? Door supervisors take note.

    From my own experiences in life (and not as a door supervisor, I hasten to add, although I do hold the licence), unfortunately I’ve been involved in self-defence scenarios on a number of occasions. Each of them resulted in me being arrested and charged, and on one occasion I had to appear in Court.

    Each time, I never used more force than was necessary, never used a weapon and stopped defending myself if my assailants stopped attacking or moved off. Yet I still ended up in trouble, with the threat of losing my livelihood and liberty.

    The world is now a much more dangerous place to live, and the moral codes that used to be set in stone are either long gone or fast disappearing. Couple that with a growing need for some to "have respect", "defend the turf" and "make a quick buck" by not working and taking the easy option, and using any method to escape capture (shoplifters carrying knives, etc), it must be said that the situation can only get worse.

    Those living in their Ivory Towers, well divorced from the realities of the front line (and I’m not talking about Iraq or Afghanistan here), need to understand that they are making the situation worse with their liberal views of blaming society (us) for all the woes and problems that persist. At the same time, they’re failing to deal with crime in anything like an effective manner.

    The massaging of statistics and continual appearances by the spin doctors have led us to where we are in the world today, whereupon there are grave economic issues to be faced, not to mention war and the growing health and social issues (of which crime is but one.

    If any Government today or in the future is going to clarify the position of ‘self-defence’, and that clarification is followed by a clear understanding for everyone involved – without the ‘Human Rights, Freedom to Do Something’-style European laws rearing their ugly head and confusing the situation – then we’ll need far better Home and Justice Ministers/leaders of the country than on offer of late.

    The police service is having to stand by and witness the counter-terrorist laws being ridiculed thanks to the Stop-and-Search debacle. Meanwhile, recent cases of political extremists running rings around common decency show that we are heading full tilt towards our own destruction.

    Indeed, the way things are going, Myleene’s actions at some point in the future would see her stoned to death for having a job and posing in a bikini while leaving her partner to look after the child.

    As for the poor trespassers, they’d have to claim benefits for the circumstances in which they find themselves. Benefits paid for by the few law-abiding, hard-working citizens who are left behind, and who need a licence to work.

    Why would I possibly want to consider defending anything?

  • Stephen Clements 16 Jan 10

    I help people review security at the smaller end of the retail sector, and have seen a few cases where the odd golf putter is present behind the counter (obviously for self-defence).

    I advise that there should be a plastic cup and golf ball somewhere on the floor, too.

    Obviously, one practices putting in the quiet times. Should one use said club to fend off a knife-wielding robber then at least the local Bobby cannot accuse the shop owner of premeditation.

  • Jilly Carter 28 Jun 10

    I've no patience for these so-called 'celebrities', but if Myleene Klass was telling the truth then I think the Hertfordshire Police has lost its marbles.

    Now, if Ms Klass had gone running down the garden and stabbed one of the youths, that's a criminal offence, but scaring some yobs off after they tried to break into your property? That most certainly isn't!

    Well done, Myleene!

Comment on this story Post your own comment on this story

Main site navigation:
Secondary site navigation:
Main site navigation end
-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-

Advertisement

-
 
-
Abacus E-media
Abacus e-Media
St. Andrews Court
St. Michaels Road
Portsmouth
PO1 2JH
-
sign up for info 4 security’s free email newsletters – click here

Advertisement